|
WORC in the News |
|
| FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 House Trade Agreement Vote Outsources Agricultural Sectors Ranchers urge Senate to reject trade agreement BILLINGS, MONT. –
Approval of the U.S. – Australia Free Trade Agreement by the U.S. House
of Representatives today threatens the livelihoods of family farmers and
ranchers, WORC (Western Organization of Resource Councils) said today.
“The House has just voted to outsource more U.S. jobs and this time they
are outsourcing the American Cowboy,” said Gilles Stockton, Chair of WORC’s
Trade Team and rancher from Grass Range, Mont.
The House approved the agreement today by a 314 to 109 margin. The agreement
would immediately end or phase out tariffs for many agricultural products,
including beef, lamb, sheep, wool, wheat, and dairy products.
“The agreement clears the way for Australia to flood U.S. markets with
these products and undercut American farmers and ranchers,” Stockton said.
According to Stockton, the agreement compromises democracy and U.S. agriculture.
“The negotiation and ratification process is blatantly undemocratic,”
he said. “This trade agreement will put many family livestock producers
out of business and it gives more economic power to multi-national corporations.”
Stockton said U.S. farmers and ranchers have suffered for ten
years under what he called unfair trade policies, the North American Free
Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization. “Agricultural imports
into the U.S. increased significantly, while agricultural exports have
stayed at the same growth level since 1994,” he said. “The balance of
ag trade has fallen 62 percent. More important though is the loss of nearly
86,500 farmers between 1997 and 2002.”
“The Senate should stop this decline by rejecting this agreement,” Stockton
said.
Karen Englehart, a Bison, S.D., rancher and a member of the WORC Trade
Team, said, “U.S.-based Swift and Co. and Cargill have become dominating
forces in Australia’s beef industry. They use cattle they own and control
to manipulate the market. This is not just a U.S. problem but an Australian
problem, depressing prices to ranchers in both countries.”
Three meat packers control and pack more than 80 percent of all beef
in this country. Swift and Co. is the largest meat packer in Australia
and the second largest U.S. meat packer and beef procurer.
On June 23, the Republican leadership in the Senate Finance Committee
refused to adopt a provision introduced by Senator Kent Conrad (D-N.D.)
that would have protected the U.S. cattle industry from increases in imports
when U.S. prices were depressed. The amendment would have required the
House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee to vote
before safeguards could be waived. However, the amendment, which would
have given elected representatives a voice in protecting U.S. cattle producers,
was left out of the legislation the House voted on today. 7/14/04 |
|